David Lammy RAGES at PMQs as he gets HUMILIATED: ‘You’re SACKED!’

Conservatives Challenge Government Over North Sea Jobs, Net Zero and Defence Spending

Political Correspondent

A heated exchange in the House of Commons saw the Conservatives accuse the Government of putting jobs, energy security and defence funding at risk, as ministers defended Labour’s economic and environmental policies.

During the session, Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho questioned Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy over employment in the North Sea energy sector and the impact of the Government’s approach to net zero.

Opening her remarks with a reference to recent political developments within the Government, Ms Coutinho asked ministers how many jobs had been lost in Aberdeen since Labour came to power.

She argued that workers in the oil and gas industry were facing uncertainty as a result of the Government’s energy policies and claimed that some employees were being encouraged to move into lower-paid roles in the renewable energy sector.

“A thousand people are losing their jobs every month in places like Aberdeen South because of Labour’s policies,” she told MPs.

“They say those oil and gas workers can get new green jobs, but what they don’t say is those salaries pay half as much.”

Ms Coutinho challenged ministers to explain how they would justify such changes to workers and families affected by the transition away from fossil fuels.

Government Defends Net Zero Strategy

Responding on behalf of the Government, Mr Lammy rejected the Opposition’s claims and accused Ms Coutinho of misrepresenting the facts.

He referenced her previous support for net zero policies and suggested her criticism was inconsistent with positions she had held while serving in government.

Labour has argued that investment in renewable energy and low-carbon industries will create new employment opportunities while reducing the UK’s dependence on fossil fuels and helping meet climate targets.

Ministers have also maintained that the transition to cleaner energy sources can support long-term economic growth and energy security.

Defence Spending Becomes Flashpoint

The exchange later shifted towards defence and public spending priorities.

Ms Coutinho criticised what she described as government expenditure on international environmental projects and research initiatives while questioning decisions affecting North Sea oil and gas production.

She argued that domestic energy production contributes to both economic resilience and national security and claimed the Government was sacrificing potential tax revenues from the sector.

“Does he really think that any of that is more important than defending our country?” she asked.

The Deputy Prime Minister rejected the suggestion that defence was being neglected and reiterated the Government’s commitment to increasing military expenditure.

“We’ve said that more spending on defence is our number one priority in this spending review and the next spending review,” he told the House.

Wider Debate Over Energy and Security

The exchange reflects a growing political debate over how Britain should balance environmental objectives, economic growth and national security.

Conservative MPs have increasingly argued that restrictions on North Sea oil and gas development risk damaging jobs and reducing domestic energy production.

Labour, by contrast, maintains that accelerating the transition to cleaner energy will strengthen energy independence while creating new industries and employment opportunities.

The discussion comes as governments across Europe continue to face difficult decisions over energy policy, industrial competitiveness and defence spending amid changing geopolitical and economic conditions.