This approach can be considered pragmatic, but it differs from the strategies of several EU member states, which would rapidly reduce their dependence on Russian energy sources. Hungary, on the other hand, prefers a gradual transition.
The position on migration is also firm. Magyar rejects the EU migration pact and would maintain border protection measures, including the southern border fence. This remains one of the main points of contention between Budapest and Brussels.
Another important factor is the issue of so-called frozen EU funds. Hungary is waiting for them to be released, while Brussels is attaching conditions to their disbursement. This creates a classic situation of political pressure.
This poses a serious strategic dilemma for Hungary. Resources would be needed to expand economic room for maneuver, but excessive concessions could provoke domestic political criticism, especially on the issue of sovereignty.
This presents a new challenge for the European Union. It is more difficult to develop a political strategy with a less confrontational leader who represents similar positions than with an openly opposing government.
Overall, the change of government did not bring a clear change of direction. The coming months may be decisive in judging whether Péter Magyar will set Hungary’s relationship with the European Union on a new course, or whether previous tensions will continue in a new form.
